tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post6224900924605057450..comments2019-07-26T22:33:34.272-04:00Comments on Ulla Popken Blog: Latest Trends!Ulla Bloggerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00077800829282086597noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-83910942682115742202011-02-23T22:51:13.569-05:002011-02-23T22:51:13.569-05:00that is definitely what I was searching for, You h...that is definitely what I was searching for, You have saved me alot of timeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-86702887780619770012009-09-05T14:09:19.747-04:002009-09-05T14:09:19.747-04:00Hey Ulla -
Love your clothing company! Still to...Hey Ulla - <br /><br />Love your clothing company! Still totally enjoying the black faux lambswool winter jacket I bought a few years ago. <br /><br />Please keep the tunics coming! And in pretty pastels. I notice you seem to favor dense cranberries, browns, and mustards which I'm not a fan of. <br /><br />Also love the longer (32 inch) tops and PLEASE cease and desist with all the sleeveless and cap-sleeve stuff. It's the main reason why I veto buying a blouse I'm otherwise in love with.<br /><br />:)Stacey Morrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16804552024529446612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-80510522804804698612009-07-16T23:45:56.962-04:002009-07-16T23:45:56.962-04:0032" tops are my absolute minimum. Many larger...32" tops are my absolute minimum. Many larger women, like me, need the extra length to cover their stomachs. I also agree with Dinah. I've lost a little weight and I'm almost between sizes. But if I go down a size to 24-26, my choices are going to be severely limited to the tops that are 32" in all sizes, which will be very disappointing.Janenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-6828961501776081182009-07-12T15:19:41.119-04:002009-07-12T15:19:41.119-04:00My desired length for a top is 34 inches, it cover...My desired length for a top is 34 inches, it covers my very robust (giggle) stomach! Make more of the tops longer than 32 please, please, please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-13578931572857985232009-06-29T13:13:10.393-04:002009-06-29T13:13:10.393-04:00The top showed in this post is adorable, I really ...The top showed in this post is adorable, I really like the pattern and shape of it.<br /><br />I agree with Carol, sleeveless is very uncomfortable for many plus size women, including myself. I'm trying very hard to find cute short sleeved shirts that are summerish. But what I find equally annoying is sleeves with elastic or bands around the upper arm, putting emphasis on what is not my best feature. <br /><br />I mentioned those elastic bands on my blog in January, as I write about fashion now and then. I also have an Ulla Popken link on my blog.<br />http://dutchdelights.blogspot.com/2009/01/plus-size-fashion-spring-2009.html<br /><br />I enjoy reading all the comments about fashion, really appreciate this blog!<br /><br />TanjaTanjahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14924866074848325863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-86533325780548641352009-06-29T10:53:32.910-04:002009-06-29T10:53:32.910-04:00I am really frustrated that so many of the summer ...I am really frustrated that so many of the summer things are sleeveless. Really cute, but sleeveless. I don't know many plus size ladies that are comfortable showing their upper arms. Please look at showing more short sleeved options next time!Carol Harryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06962535622673666558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-11936642009592104092009-06-27T01:46:23.728-04:002009-06-27T01:46:23.728-04:00I agree with Dinah longer tops short ones just do ...I agree with Dinah longer tops short ones just do not work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-5309097153716793872009-06-26T16:05:04.295-04:002009-06-26T16:05:04.295-04:0031 - 32" because i have a longer torso than l...31 - 32" because i have a longer torso than legsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-29420744633127349132009-06-26T02:03:29.496-04:002009-06-26T02:03:29.496-04:00I'm long waisted and the minimum length I wear...I'm long waisted and the minimum length I wear is 30 inches but, I prefer 32-34. Anything shorter than that looks ridiculous on me. When I shop I look for Tunics first so I will be more likely to find the longer lengths.<br /><br />I love the clothing I have purchased from Ulla Popken but, would like to see more information. For example, woven material doesn't stretch so bust and hip measurements would help a lot in finding the correct size. And some items just beg to have a photo of the back.<br /><br />My biggest beef with most Plus size clothing catalogs is the skinny models. I like seeing clothes I may want to buy modeled by a larger woman. Even a size 28-30.Susieqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14755115344960778215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37808422.post-50338987660731892452009-06-22T11:22:15.105-04:002009-06-22T11:22:15.105-04:00You don't know how happy I am that others are ...You don't know how happy I am that others are requesting longer tops. I have been frustrated that you are sizing your length in tops with sizes. I wear a 24-26 usually, but looking at the range, I won't be able to get a 32" top any more. I have absolutely not bought things that I would have purchased before when you had so many more 32" tops. That was one of your signatures and I loved it! Please expand your range again to 32" in all the tops that you used to do including all the t-shirts. By the way, your spring catalog was wonderful--the best in a long time. Unfortunately, I didn't order soon enough and when I went to order you were out of all the tops I loved. Please bring those tunic type shirts back again.Dinah Williamsnoreply@blogger.com